Im just gonna say it out:What the hell were you thinking when you wrote the last 4/5 lines of hells heroes?Have you got any idea how blasphemious it was?Im
guessing:No
hells heroes ending
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 ChrisKenToye |
hells heroes ending |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 251 (27 October, 2009 20:24:11) |
|
||
|
lodylody |
|||
|
Posts: 149 (27 October, 2009 21:17:35) |
blaspheme vb -pheming, -phemed 1 to speak disrespectfully of (God and other sacred things) 2 to
utter curses
lolz to you (I think that's an accurate way to describe your comment) |
||
|
ChrisKenToye |
|||
|
Posts: 261 (28 October, 2009 21:34:02) |
i rote this in the questions forum.weird
that was blasphemy.he spoke disrespectfully about the bible which is Gods word |
||
|
lodylody |
|||
|
Posts: 151 (29 October, 2009 11:44:07) |
If everyone took things as seriously as you are now, the world would be a sad place - every joke critiscising someone will become a war, TV Show's will
start a row. Now, The Bible was written by several men - and who's to say God wouldn't have laughed at the ending, or even enjoyed it (liking it). Now,
this book is fiction. Not. Real. So, it is fiction. Grubbs isn't real. He didn't say that. A book is for somebody's enjoyment. A
book is a lie. So if I say 'an enormous meatball fell out of the sky' in a story, it is a lie. But the serious you're taking, it is the truth.
Every book is blasphemy, every piece of speech is blasphemy, for goodness sake, almost everything is blasphemy if you look hard enough!
I hope I may have stopped your rediculous suggestions. |
||
|
BM14murph |
|||
|
Posts: 126 (29 October, 2009 12:07:09) |
I really hope your taking the pi** with this mate
Listen to lodylody!!! |
||
|
loulou123 |
|||
|
Posts: 257 (29 October, 2009 15:58:05) |
Omg Haa, LodyLOdy is such a good debater , well said , well said!
|
||
|
ChrisKenToye |
|||
|
Posts: 265 (29 October, 2009 23:10:27) |
It seems im gonna have to kick all your ass in this argument.Excellent!
1)this is a forum for opinions, so I get to have my say 2)'Hello' is not blasphemy which crushes your whole argument(basically) 3)A suggestion is not ridicolous if it has a proven point 4)Just because something isn't true doesn't mean it can't be respectful 5)1 post is not a debate 6)I'm not takin the pi**, no i won't listen to him 7)Why did you define blasphemy in your first post? 8)I take very little seriously 9)Thank you for telling me the book was fiction,I never would have guessed 10)If a book made fun of me,whatever about you, I wouldn't like it 11)I know what enjoyed it and fiction mean, so that was totally pointless |
||
|
lodylody |
|||
|
Posts: 152 (30 October, 2009 07:46:33) |
Thank you BM and loulou (hey, it rhymes!) for your nice comments.
Ooh, good - now we're onto numbers - that's where you get to prove every point in great depth! 1) Yes, but it does have limits. In the middle of debates, my say might be 'I need to excrete waste (look it up)' - that's a bit to far though. 2) This is probably the best thing I have had to argue with (still bad, though...). 'Hello.' I havn't read it, but the is a 10/10 chance that God/Jesus has said hello in the bible. There is a possibilty you could be mocking him. 3) But yours has no basis, it's just a loonie doing a debate without one. May I ask WHAT IS your proven point... 4) I didn't say that. But I didn't say it had to be. Only read the bible! Every book can have blasphemy - The Spooks does. It states that when you die there's nothing. That don't follow God... 5) Sorry, loulou, but he's got you there (thanks for the comment anyway). 6) Sorry BM, but he isn't. And I know you won't listen to me, that's what I'm trying to put a stop to... 7) Because I didn't think you understood how to use the word - clearly, you still don't.  I'll believe that when I see it.
9) Sarcy little rat. 10) If it was just a little fun, I would be fine with it. Sort of like jokes - and as good as 'God' is supposed to be, he would be fine with it. 11) I think that you are a tomato head - angry, disgusting and pointless. The point was that God won't mind. He'll love reading things which mention him. He won't turn his nose up. He knows they don't actually mean it. Like actors. I might say to somebody who I hate 'I love you'. I don't mean it. They don't get shocked by it - they know it ain't real. Basic round-up: You're wrong! I'm right! |
||
|
U2lover |
|||
|
Posts: 248 (30 October, 2009 09:39:09) |
1) No comment...
2) Where did you get mathematics? 10/10 you're wrong, there's not a single Hello in the Bible... 3-6) No comment... 7) Dictionaries are no good. A defenition isn't clear when someone else gives it to you. Only when you light your own candle, it can shine for others as well. 8-10) No comment, though 9 was a useless reaction. Only post things when they have a purpose. 11) I think God would mind. If someone would suggest he's just an ordinary creature, it would be disgraceful. An almighty creature is something nobody can imagine. I wonder how you know that: "God won't mind. He'll love reading things which mention him. He won't turn his nose up. He knows they don't actually mean it." Unless you're Him, which I suppose you're not, you cannot know this. You can hazard a guess, but never, ever be sure about something the size of God and Jezus. Basic round-up: Give me ONE point why you are right and he is wrong. |
||
|
Retsaot |
|||
|
Posts: 333 (30 October, 2009 10:24:18) |
I understand ChrisKenToye's point, though as I read it I never considered the idea.
I also see lodylody's point, it is being taken too seriously, in my opinion.
Last Edited By: Retsaot
30 October, 2009 10:28:46.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
lodylody |
|||
|
Posts: 153 (30 October, 2009 10:33:58) |
Give it a rest, for goodness sake.
1, 3-6, 8 & 10) Good. 2) It ain't mathematics, it's just certain (1/1, 2/2, 3/3 etc.). 7) We have a 'wisy' type. Bad luck, lody... 9) Did his point have any purpose either? 11) In the Bible the teachings imply (and almost certify) that he wouldn't mind - read it... Basic round-up: Did you read all of my posts? P.S. Darren, for my sanity, will you please just level out the playing thread and close this thread (even if only one person is right, with a few followers, and the rest are stupid the stupid people will win...)... I beg you...
Last Edited By: lodylody
30 October, 2009 10:35:59.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
Mgooy |
|||
|
Posts: 108 (30 October, 2009 11:26:58) |
Hell's heroes DOES say there is a god, or some sort of higher force, that rules over everything.
|
||
|
U2lover |
|||
|
Posts: 249 (30 October, 2009 16:13:16) |
"2) This is probably the best thing I have had to argue with (still bad, though...). 'Hello.' I havn't read it, but the is a 10/10 chance that
God/Jesus has said hello in the bible. There is a possibilty you could be mocking him. "
"11) In the Bible the teachings imply (and almost certify) that he wouldn't mind - read it... " So you haven't read the Bible but know the content? That's weird... And I agree we have to close this topic. I'm not gonna pick either sides, but I think we shouldn't be taking it too serious. As you said Lody, it just is fiction. Not real. Period. |
||
|
RachelKennedy |
|||
|
Posts: 5 (30 October, 2009 18:03:30) |
ok i thought the last few lines were brilliant! im as religious as anyone else but i dont think these lines were ever meant to be offensive! it was a
joke...grubbs created the heaven and the earth(he was the trigger of the kah gash) an grubbs said let there be light!! he was recreating the world and i say so
what if he used something that origionally was in the bible! i'm trying to say this in the most respectful way possible but i think theses lines where the
perfect closing lines for the series! it certainly left me thinking about it and he was supposed to be creating the world, so maybe he was pretending to be god
a little but i don't see anything wrong, it was a bit of goodnatured fun not blasphamy! i think anyone who was giving out about it is a little too
untight...darren shan earlier in the book said they could feel an even higher forse than the kah gash and i think was just showing some of grubbs'
personality in that he was thinking he just being a bit bigheaded if u kno wha i mean?!!! nothing wrong with it in my opinion it ws a good ending!!
|
||
|
RachelKennedy |
|||
|
Posts: 7 (30 October, 2009 18:15:42) |
the book wasn't makin fun of anybody not even god it was just grubbs character shining through, lodylody is right
|
||
|
Retsaot |
|||
|
Posts: 334 (30 October, 2009 20:37:28) |
U2lover wrote: To be fair, U2, I have only read the first few chapters of the Bible (which was recently) and even before then I already knew a lot of the content. |
||
|
lodylody |
|||
|
Posts: 154 (30 October, 2009 21:15:53) |
Listen - Rachel has said basically what I was trying to get across - thank you for aggreeing with me. I agree with you too.
P.S. I just guess what's in The Bible... |
||
|
Grubbsy |
|||
|
Posts: 633 (31 October, 2009 01:07:23) |
Who CARES?!
Seriously man, all it was is a little pun that Grubbs thought was rather clever. |
||
|
sk8rrach |
|||
|
Posts: 13 (31 October, 2009 13:14:31) |
Loved the book
 and I like the ending
|
||
|
Retsaot |
|||
|
Posts: 339 (31 October, 2009 19:12:27) |
Grubbsy wrote: |
||
|
ChrisKenToye |
|||
|
Posts: 266 (31 October, 2009 20:37:44) |
Mgogly:it says their is a higher force.It also hints that it is 3 people
U2lover:No offense but you contradicted yourself by saying Lody was right(not in so many words) RK:I know what your saying,just don't agree Ret:The book puts Grubbs in the position of God LL:same as RK Gru:I quite obviously care And the last 2 had nothing to do with the argument. If Darren shuts down this thing,he best tell us what he was thinking before he does |
||
